Support LuckyRooster

Please support independent media with a contribution

Please Help Us Reach Our Goal


Categories


3-D Slideshow

daily2

Obamas In Europe

obamabo77.jpg michelle32.jpg bt.jpg obo.jpg n1021303678_30389628_2706152.jpg n610590042_6586.jpg n1021303678_30389625_4280686.jpg mo436.jpg n1021303678_30389622_1912333.jpg bomo.jpg

Easter

iseasthnt1.jpg jim_clyburn_fish_fry0903.jpg 100_1553.jpg bo6y.jpg obamabo5.jpg jim_clyburn_fish_fry0913.jpg obma9.jpg n610590042_6807674_1645717.jpg btbo.jpg jim_clyburn_fish_fry0907.jpg

Save Our Jobs

sup1400.jpg me45400.jpg me44400.jpg k785400.jpg k123810400.jpg allme1400.jpg all8400.jpg 100_1631400.jpg 100_16264.jpg 100_1621400.jpg

White House 4th

4th-white-house-5.jpg 4th-whitehouse11.jpg 4th-whitehouse7.jpg 4th_whitehouse1.jpg 4th-white-house12.jpg 4th-white-hous9.jpg 4th-whitehouse14.jpg 4th-whitehouse4.jpg

Archives

Obama’s Crazy-Ambitious Plan for High-Speed Rail

High Speed Rail Plan

High Speed Rail Plan

Europeans and Japanese already enjoy high-speed rail service, but Americans are woefully dependent on cars and planes to get from city to city. Not for long, if Obama has anything to say about it. Obama’s right-hand goon, Joe Biden, unveiled the administration’s plans for high-speed rail all across the country today, showing off a seriously impressive map that adds lines connecting cities all over the country.

Of course, this is all going to take time and a whole lot of money. The first line that’s likely to go in, thanks to its advanced state of planning, is the California section, which hopes to link up its major cities with a 200mph rail line sometime in the next decade. What’s unclear is how all of this will be paid for. After all, the current stimulus package has $8 billion marked for high-speed rail projects.

Sounds like a lot until you learn that the CA section alone will cost somewhere around $40 billion. But still, in the long run the benefits of a reliable, fast rail system connecting major cities is clear. I hope they’re able to make this happen. [WhiteHouse.gov and The Economist]

21

Obama Reports $2.6 Million in Book Income

Barack Obama’s successful quest for the White House powered the sales of his nonfiction books, making him millions even as he assumed the presidency, his tax returns show. As a candidate in 2008, Obama earned about $2.6 million from the sale of his books, “The Audacity of Hope” and “Dreams From My Father,” according to returns the White House released yesterday.

The book sales represented the vast majority of the first couple’s income, although they also reported wages of about $200,000 and a small amount of investment income. Together, Obama and his wife, Michelle, paid about $855,000 in federal taxes. They would have received a $26,000 refund, but asked that the amount be applied to their 2009 income taxes instead. Source: Washington Post

First Puppy

First Puppy

Mississippi Injustice: A Double-Life Sentence For $11.00

Race and the Obama Administration

By Danny Glover

April 8, 2009

Danny Glover

Danny Glover

In 2001 I traveled to Durban, South Africa, to join the tens of thousands of people who came to participate in the United Nations-sponsored World Conference Against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance. More than 2,000 came from the United States, a rainbow of people crossing all lines–racial, ethnic, national, language, immigration status, religious and much more–joining an equally diverse crowd from across the globe.

It was an extraordinary opportunity to meet, discuss, argue and strategize over how to rid the world of these longstanding evils.

Our participation paralleled that of the official US delegation. And that’s where we faced a huge challenge. The Bush administration team, having only grudgingly agreed to participate at all, made clear they had no real commitment to fighting racism or offering leadership on other challenging issues of discrimination.

When they didn’t like a few small parts of the sixty-one-page text, they packed up and walked out of the conference. It was a sad but hardly surprising moment, exposing once again the history of US failures to take seriously the consequences of its own legacy of racism, a point most recently made by Attorney General Eric Holder.

The 2001 Declaration expressed powerful truths.

It stated: “We acknowledge and profoundly regret the massive human suffering and the tragic plight of millions of men, women and children caused by slavery, the slave trade, the transatlantic slave trade, apartheid, colonialism and genocide, and call upon States concerned to honour the memory of the victims of past tragedies and affirm that, wherever and whenever these occurred, they must be condemned and their recurrence prevented.”

Another part declared, “We recognize the inalienable right of the Palestinian people to self-determination and to the establishment of an independent State and we recognize the right to security for all States in the region, including Israel, and call upon all States to support the peace process and bring it to an early conclusion.”

Now, eight years later, the United Nations is convening the Durban Review Conference in Geneva April 20 to 24 to review and assess the progress since 2001. Member nations have toiled for two years to craft an outcome document that assesses the current analysis and challenges.

This document–which called for particular measures to provide support and reparations to all the victims both of long-ago histories, like the descendants of the European-Atlantic slave trade, and those facing contemporary forms of discrimination and apartheid policies, such as the Roma, the Dalits (India’s “untouchables”) and the Palestinians–was rejected by the Obama administration.

This year we thought things would be different. Our country has taken a huge step in our long struggle against racism: we have elected our first African-American president. And perhaps more important, the mobilization of people who made Barack Obama’s election possible brought more young people of color into political action, with others of various ethnic and political backgrounds, than perhaps any campaign before.

It is a moment not to sit on our laurels; certainly, we have much farther to go. But it is certainly a moment for our nation’s political leadership to acknowledge a new marker in the long and painful struggle for justice, and a time to offer global leadership in the United Nations forum organized to combat bigotry and injustice.

In an effort to address the administration’s concerns, the United Nations has released a new “outcome document,” stripped of all language deemed offensive or controversial. Yet we face the sad reality that our president, the first African-American to lead this country, who has galvanized hope among victims of injustice around the world and encouraged them to stand up with dignity for their rights, has yet to indicate if he will send an official delegation or continue to abstain from the entire process.

Our historical struggle against racism can claim great progress as a legacy of the civil rights movement led by the likes of Fanny Lou Hamer and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., but this 2009 review of the 2001 Durban conference against racism should still be a moment in which the administration of President Obama returns to the world stage to join deliberations aimed at making even further progress against injustice.

For twenty years, Congressman John Conyers, dean of the Congressional Black Caucus, has annually introduced a bill urging the United States to form a commission to study whether reparations are an appropriate response to the continuing legacy of slavery in our country.

Would not the Durban Review Conference be a perfect venue to the administration to support the remedies recommended by the global community of nations to overcome the impacts of racism, slavery, anti-Semitism, apartheid and other forms of discrimination?

Would this United Nations conference not be exactly the right place for our new president to show the world that his administration’s commitment to “change we can believe in” means rejecting our country’s tarnished legacy of violating international law, undermining the United Nations and using American exceptionalism to justify walking away from the leadership responsibility many in the world expect of the United States?

To make that change clear, wouldn’t this be a great opportunity to remind the world that even if the final document does not call out the name of every perpetrator government, the United States at least believes that every group of victims facing discrimination or worse based on their identity, especially the most vulnerable, and those who are stateless and thus in need of special attention by the international community, should be named and promised assistance?

This should be a moment for the United States to rejoin the global struggle against racism, the struggle that the Bush administration so arrogantly abandoned. I hope President Obama will agree that the United States must participate with other nations in figuring out the tough issues of how to overcome racism and other forms of discrimination and intolerance, and how to provide repair to victims.

Our country certainly has much to learn; and maybe, for the first time in a long time, we have something by way of leadership to share with the rest of the world in continuing our long struggle to overcome.


Martin Luther King’s Son Recalls April 4, 1968 “When you’ve been raised in a home of love, and for your loved one to be taken away from you through violence, a lot of emotions go through your mind.” Martin Luther King III April 4, 2008 · Forty years ago, the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. was killed by an assassin’s bullet. The famed civil rights leader died in Memphis, where he was due to march on behalf of striking sanitation workers. King’s involvement in the demonstrations was to add to the Atlanta-based preacher’s robust campaign against racial injustice and poverty in America. His son, Martin Luther King III, was only 10 years old when his family was forever changed by a tragedy that would echo around the world. He remembers learning his father had been harmed. “My siblings and I were watching the evening news and we saw it flashed across the screen that our father had been shot … we just knew that something terrible had happened.” He recalls that his mother, the late Coretta Scott King, rushed to be by his side. Before reaching her critically wounded husband, he would die from his wounds. The grieving wife and mother, who would later carry her husband’s torch in the fight for equality, attempted to explain the news to her children. “She shared that our father had gone home to live with God,” King recalls. “He would not be able to talk to us, he would not be able to embrace us, but he would appear as if he was sleeping.” The days ahead would be a challenge for the children, as they tried to make sense of what happened. “When you’ve been raised in a home of love, and for your loved one to be taken away from you through violence, a lot of emotions go through your mind,” says King, who calls the assassination the most “tragic and traumatic” time of their lives.



You must be logged in to post a comment.

Bookmark and Share