|
|||||
Politics
Democrats Must Get Blacks to the Polls By: Tonyaa Weathersbee, BlackAmericaWeb.com Nearly two years ago, the “audacity of hope” worked for presidential candidate Barack Obama. That’s because the wave of hope that swept Obama into the Oval Office, the hope that led many black people to vote for the first time and many white voters to vote for a black man, is being flattened by the politics of fear. Obama barely had time to settle in before the GOP and their wingnut brethren – the tea partiers – began planting doubts in the minds of voters about the black man to whom they had entrusted the nation’s highest office. They did this not through any honest debate, but by linking Obama’s attempts to govern to Americans’ worse nightmares and stereotypes. Health care reform? Socialism. Obama’s plans to address children on the first day of school? Hitlerism. His inability to plug the ruptured well gushing oil into the Gulf of Mexico – a disaster that top scientists have been unable to quell? Inattentiveness. Obama’s failure to fix an economy in 18 months that his white predecessor took eight years to wreck? Incompetence. It’s all ridiculous, of course. But sadly, some of it seems to be working. According to a Washington Post – ABC poll, Obama’s approval rating among whites has dropped from around 60 percent since the start of his presidency to just over 40 percent now. Independents are leaning Republican, and GOP voters are more enthusiastic about voting in the midterm elections than Democratic voters. On top of that, strategists say that if white voter turnout returns to its 2006 midterm levels, it could mean devastating losses for the Democrats and Obama’s agenda. Those numbers tell me that it’s past time for Democrats and Obama to lay on the audacity. According to the Washington Post, the Democratic National Committee is spending millions to conjure the 2008 model that got Obama elected to get record numbers of blacks and Latinos to turn out to vote in the midterms. This time, though, Democrats ought to drive home the point to black voters, voters who may not be inspired enough to make a trip to the polls without Obama on the ballot, that they need to vote – and not simply to support the president’s agenda. Democrats should tell them that they need to vote to stop the GOP from pursuing an agenda that is all about putting black people “back in their place.” That’s not making politics dirty. That’s keeping it real. Democratic operatives should remind black people about the racist underpinnings of the Tea Party – the GOP’s new engine of enthusiasm. They should remind them of their attempts to distinguish “real” Americans – meaning them – against “unreal “Americans – meaning black people and anyone else who voted for Obama. They should print out fliers of tea partiers carrying signs with racial slurs scrawled upon them, with the caricatures of Obama as a tribal witch doctor, as Hitler, as a Muslim terrorist – and remind black voters that if they can subject a Harvard-trained lawyer and family man like Obama to that type of demonization, imagine what racists like that will do to them if given the power. They should put the words of Rand Paul, the Kentucky GOP Senate contender who believes that the 1964 Civil Rights Act went too far in preventing restaurants from discriminating against black customers, into campaign literature – and distribute it in black districts. That literature should highlight quotes from Tom Tancredo, the former Colorado GOP congressman, suggesting to an audience of tea partiers that literacy tests – a tool that was used in the Jim Crow South to prevent blacks from voting – be reinstituted to prevent the election of any future Obamas. And the Democrats should also play up quotes from Republican lawmakers who recently stooped to vilifying Thurgood Marshall; the late black Supreme Court justice who viewed the Constitution as a tool for ensuring opportunity rather than protecting privilege. Doing that, however, takes a lot of audacity – and chances are Obama won’t want to go there. Understandably, he wants his legacy to be one of hope; one in which a president tapped into the better nature of all Americans to make this country the best that it can be. But that task becomes difficult when the GOP and the tea partiers, folks for whom Obama’s ascendancy represents an erosion of their privilege, continue to gin up fears about his intentions, his competency and even his legitimacy. Their fear of Obama, and their vilification of civil rights icons and long-settled civil rights issues, is really a backlash against the rise of minorities. The Democrats should work to see to it that come November, black folks don’t give them any help by staying home. Swearing in Justice Sonia Sotomayor At U.S. Supreme Court President Obama Nominates Judge Sonia Sotomayor for Supreme Court Obama Talks About Race at South America Summit Scott Wilson, Washington Post
In 2001 I traveled to Durban, South Africa, to join the tens of thousands of people who came to participate in the United Nations-sponsored World Conference Against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance. More than 2,000 came from the United States, a rainbow of people crossing all lines–racial, ethnic, national, language, immigration status, religious and much more–joining an equally diverse crowd from across the globe. It was an extraordinary opportunity to meet, discuss, argue and strategize over how to rid the world of these longstanding evils. Our participation paralleled that of the official US delegation. And that’s where we faced a huge challenge. The Bush administration team, having only grudgingly agreed to participate at all, made clear they had no real commitment to fighting racism or offering leadership on other challenging issues of discrimination. When they didn’t like a few small parts of the sixty-one-page text, they packed up and walked out of the conference. It was a sad but hardly surprising moment, exposing once again the history of US failures to take seriously the consequences of its own legacy of racism, a point most recently made by Attorney General Eric Holder. The 2001 Declaration expressed powerful truths. It stated: “We acknowledge and profoundly regret the massive human suffering and the tragic plight of millions of men, women and children caused by slavery, the slave trade, the transatlantic slave trade, apartheid, colonialism and genocide, and call upon States concerned to honour the memory of the victims of past tragedies and affirm that, wherever and whenever these occurred, they must be condemned and their recurrence prevented.” Another part declared, “We recognize the inalienable right of the Palestinian people to self-determination and to the establishment of an independent State and we recognize the right to security for all States in the region, including Israel, and call upon all States to support the peace process and bring it to an early conclusion.” Now, eight years later, the United Nations is convening the Durban Review Conference in Geneva April 20 to 24 to review and assess the progress since 2001. Member nations have toiled for two years to craft an outcome document that assesses the current analysis and challenges. This document–which called for particular measures to provide support and reparations to all the victims both of long-ago histories, like the descendants of the European-Atlantic slave trade, and those facing contemporary forms of discrimination and apartheid policies, such as the Roma, the Dalits (India’s “untouchables”) and the Palestinians–was rejected by the Obama administration. This year we thought things would be different. Our country has taken a huge step in our long struggle against racism: we have elected our first African-American president. And perhaps more important, the mobilization of people who made Barack Obama’s election possible brought more young people of color into political action, with others of various ethnic and political backgrounds, than perhaps any campaign before. It is a moment not to sit on our laurels; certainly, we have much farther to go. But it is certainly a moment for our nation’s political leadership to acknowledge a new marker in the long and painful struggle for justice, and a time to offer global leadership in the United Nations forum organized to combat bigotry and injustice. In an effort to address the administration’s concerns, the United Nations has released a new “outcome document,” stripped of all language deemed offensive or controversial. Yet we face the sad reality that our president, the first African-American to lead this country, who has galvanized hope among victims of injustice around the world and encouraged them to stand up with dignity for their rights, has yet to indicate if he will send an official delegation or continue to abstain from the entire process. Our historical struggle against racism can claim great progress as a legacy of the civil rights movement led by the likes of Fanny Lou Hamer and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., but this 2009 review of the 2001 Durban conference against racism should still be a moment in which the administration of President Obama returns to the world stage to join deliberations aimed at making even further progress against injustice. For twenty years, Congressman John Conyers, dean of the Congressional Black Caucus, has annually introduced a bill urging the United States to form a commission to study whether reparations are an appropriate response to the continuing legacy of slavery in our country. Would not the Durban Review Conference be a perfect venue to the administration to support the remedies recommended by the global community of nations to overcome the impacts of racism, slavery, anti-Semitism, apartheid and other forms of discrimination? Would this United Nations conference not be exactly the right place for our new president to show the world that his administration’s commitment to “change we can believe in” means rejecting our country’s tarnished legacy of violating international law, undermining the United Nations and using American exceptionalism to justify walking away from the leadership responsibility many in the world expect of the United States? To make that change clear, wouldn’t this be a great opportunity to remind the world that even if the final document does not call out the name of every perpetrator government, the United States at least believes that every group of victims facing discrimination or worse based on their identity, especially the most vulnerable, and those who are stateless and thus in need of special attention by the international community, should be named and promised assistance? This should be a moment for the United States to rejoin the global struggle against racism, the struggle that the Bush administration so arrogantly abandoned. I hope President Obama will agree that the United States must participate with other nations in figuring out the tough issues of how to overcome racism and other forms of discrimination and intolerance, and how to provide repair to victims. Our country certainly has much to learn; and maybe, for the first time in a long time, we have something by way of leadership to share with the rest of the world in continuing our long struggle to overcome. Related articles by Zemanta
1 comment to PoliticsYou must be logged in to post a comment. |
|||||
|
Copyright © 2010 luckyrooster Register Log in - All Rights Reserved 141 queries. 1.259 seconds. |
|||||
IBM ships more of our jobs overseas
Share
Today at 6:47am
With the U.S. economy in full meltdown mode, and more and more Americans finding themselves out of work these days, what does IBM do?
IBM’s response is to lay off about 5,000 of its U.S. employees and ship many of their jobs to India.
IBM has chosen to be part of the problem. IBM has chosen to take this action that will make matters even worse for the U.S. economy and its workers.
Shame on IBM!