Free Coin Purse with purchase!
AbeBooks.com – Textbooks

Support LuckyRooster

Please support independent media with a contribution

Please Help Us Reach Our Goal


Categories


Pages

We’ll Soon Wish We Still Had ACORN

By:

Tonyaa Weathersbee, BlackAmericaWeb.com

ACORN, the community organizing group that became an obsession of right-wingers appalled that scores of black people dared to exercise their right to vote in 2008, was recently vindicated by the General Accountability Office.

As it turns out, the GAO found that the group, which is formally known as the Association of Communities Organizing for Reform now, did not misuse any of the $40 million in taxpayer funds it received between 2005 and 2009.

Seems that when Congress voted to strip it of its funding last year, all it was guilty of was employing some dimwitted folks who allowed conservative operatives masquerading as a pimp and whore to dupe them into doling out illegal  advice.

But now, ACORN is in tatters – done in by a doctored videotape and a Republican witch hunt. And their demise couldn’t have come at a worse time.

I say this because in 2008, the organization helped to register millions of voters in key swing states that President Obama won. And while there’s no denying that the communities ACORN serves tend to be filled with black and poor people who are constantly marginalized and vilified by the GOP, the key thing that they did was help millions of people understand the power that voting gives them.


Perhaps, just perhaps, ACORN could have used its power to persuade many of those same people who voted for the first time in 2008 to vote in the upcoming midterm elections – because there are lots of people who are counting on them to stay home as they vote to undo what was done two years ago.

I know this because recently, Gallup released a poll showing that Republicans and Republican-leaning independents are more enthusiastic about voting in the midterm elections this year than they’ve ever been in the past. Fifty-nine percent of them say they plan to vote in November, compared to 44 percent of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents.

That’s the highest average that Gallup has found among Republicans since it first asked the question in 1994 – the year that the GOP swept both housing of Congress and saddled us with Newt Gingrich and the Contact with America.

That tells me that that a whole lot of GOP voters see a chance to, by way of their vote, accomplish what all the town hall screaming and racial epithets couldn’t: Neutralize Obama’s agenda. It also tells me that a lot of Democrats are, at this point, either disillusioned by what he hasn’t done, or don’t understand that he still needs them to vote

if he is to get anything done.

For some of that, Obama has himself to blame.
When black people and Latino people went out and voted for him in unprecedented numbers, they did so because they saw him as representing a new social and political order; one in which their needs and issues would be a priority.

But so far, that hasn’t happened.

There’s no immigration bill. Black unemployment is still triple that of whites, and while Obama inherited an economy that will certainly take years to fix, he’s shown little inclination to create any programs that target black joblessness.

Of course, Obama continues to poll high among those key constituencies. But he isn’t on the ballot, and the voters who put him over the top in 2008 haven’t seen enough difference in their own lives to make the connection between the president’s success and the success of his party in the midterms.

The Democratic Party realizes this is a problem – and it plans to spend $50 million to get those new Obama voters to return to the polls come November.

Still, I wish ACORN was around to help because voting shouldn’t just be about putting a particular party in power, but about helping marginalized people realize their own power to hold all politicians – Obama included – accountable.

I also wish they’d vote because it’s disturbing to hear right-wing pundits continue to paint Obama’s election as an anomaly – because what they’re really saying to white politicians is that without Obama’s name on the ballot, they never have to worry about black folks voting again.

That alone ought to be enough to make black people mad. Mad enough to prove them wrong.

Council Bill Asks Congress to Restore ACORN Funding

City Councilman Jumaane Williams has a message for the federal government.

Last week, the Brooklyn Democrat introduced a resolution in the Council that calls on Congress to restore federal funding to ACORN, the beleaguered housing advocacy group that shuttered most of its organization after the House passed a resolution blocking federal funds last year.

Williams wants Congress to adhere to a federal district court decision that deemed the federal action against ACORN unconstitutional. The ruling, made in December in New York’s Eastern District, is being appealed.

“This is kind of unprecedented,” Williams, a former housing activist, said. “No time in history has Congress just repealed funding based on simple accusations. There was no trial, no official charges; nothing.”

He’s optimistic about the resolution’s chances. “I feel good, I feel like it can pass,” he said. “There are some people who automatically will sign on to it.” He declined to give names but said that New York City should take a firm stand in support of ACORN, which he said has kept housing affordable in neighborhoods such as Flatbush Gardens, where he grew up. “I personally love the work ACORN did in my community.”

Prejudice, Williams said, has motivated attacks against ACORN.


“They do work for a lot of communities of color. I think that’s exactly the reason they were attacked for this. They were set up,” he said, referring to the video released in September in which two activists posing as a pimp and prostitute solicited law-breaking advice from ACORN officials.


“I always think race and economics play a part in all of what we do,” Williams said. “The more melanin you have in your skin and the poorer you are, the more worse off you’re going to be. It’s systemic and it’s systematic.”

Vindication Doesn’t Pay the Bills

ACORN Report Finds No Illegal Conduct

Zachary Roth |

ACORN, Scott Harshbarger

ACORN employees caught in those undercover videos advising a couple posing as a pimp and a prostitute on how to break the law acted unprofessionally and inappropriately, but did nothing illegal, a report commissioned by ACORN and conducted by an independent investigator has found.

The report, by former Massachusetts Attorney General Scott Harshbarger, recommends nine steps for ACORN to take in order to regain public trust in the wake of the scandal, including that it return to its “core competency – community organizing and citizen engagement empowerment, with related services.”

On the key question of potential illegal conduct, it finds:

While some of the advice and counsel given by ACORN employees and volunteers was clearly inappropriate and unprofessional, we did not find a pattern of intentional, illegal conduct by ACORN staff; in fact, there is no evidence that action, illegal or otherwise, was taken by any ACORN employee on behalf of the videographers.

Harshbarger also notes that the videos were sometimes less than perfect representations of the events they depict. He writes:

The videos that have been released appear to have been edited, in some cases substantially, including the insertion of a substitute voiceover for significant portions of Mr. O’Keefe’s and Ms. Giles’s comments, which makes it difficult to determine the questions to which ACORN employees are responding. A comparison of the publicly available transcripts to the released videos confirms that large portions of the original video have been omitted from the released versions.

In the wake of the scandal, Congress voted to cut off all federal funds from ACORN. In response, the group is suing the US government, arguing that the measure is a bill of attainder, and therefore unconstitutional.

Robert Borosage, of the progressive Campaign for America’s Future, responded to the report’s findings by declaring that “an organization that has done remarkable work organizing and empowering the poorest Americans was targeted and slurred by a right-wing hit team, then persecuted by legislators who should have known better.”

Senate denies ACORN funding By: Alex Isenstadt September 14, 2009 09:13 PM EDT

The Senate dealt a blow to ACORN Monday evening, voting to deny the Department of Housing and Urban Development from granting funds to the community organization. Sen. Mike Johanns’s (R-Neb.) amendment to the appropriations bill providing funding to the department passed in a bipartisan, 83-7 vote. It’s the latest in a series of recent setbacks for ACORN, which has come under increasing fire from conservative activists and lawmakers.

Over the last several weeks, the organization has seen employees in Florida arrested for allegedly taking part in voter registration fraud and has watched as the Census Bureau decide to sever its ties with the group. And in an embarrassing turn of events, Acorn employees were caught on hidden camera divulging advice to actors portraying a prostitute and her pimp on how to file tax forms. “With so much in the air about the need for bipartisanship, I’m very glad my colleagues rose above partisan differences to say ‘no’ to sending more tax dollars to ACORN-whose employees have multiple convictions of undermining our democratic process, our laws, and our good faith,” Johanns said in a statement.

Only a handful of Democrats sided with Acorn on the vote: Illinois Sen. Roland Burris, Pennsylvania Sen. Bob Casey, Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin, New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, Vermont Sen. Patrick Leahy, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, and Rhode Island Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse. In a statement, ACORN CEO Bertha Lewis said: “We’re disappointed that the Senate took the rare and politically convenient step of supporting eliminating some federal funding for a single organization, one that has been the target of a multi-year political assault stemming variously from the Bush White House, Fox News, and other conservative quarters.”

© 2010 Capitol News Company, LLC

How Do Prostitutes Pay Their Taxes?

With 1040 Schedule C, of course.

By Brian Palmer
Posted Monday, Sept. 21, 2009, at 6:29 PM ET


ACORN, the community organizing group and Republican cause célèbre, lost its federal funding last week after some of its employees were captured on video telling people they thought were prostitutes how to manipulate tax laws. How do real prostitutes go about paying their taxes?

They report their income on IRS Form 1040 Schedule C (PDF) and pay self-employment tax in addition to ordinary income taxes. Sex-worker advocacy organizations regularly receive requests for tax advice. Some prostitutes, for example, might need help with the first line on the form—which asks the filer to identify her profession and service offered. It turns out that the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination permits a prostitute to leave this line blank or provide a vague answer like “sale of leisure services.” The form also requires the filer to select a code for line of business. The ACORN employee recommended 711510 (“independent artists, writers, and performers”), but 713900 (“other amusement and recreation services”) and 812990 (“all other personal services”) would have been equally appropriate.



Successful prostitutes may claim to be working in a related field, like nursing or psychology. There are some powerful incentives for these women to file: If a high-earning prostitute wants to buy a house or a car or sign up for a credit card, she’ll need to report some income. One way to do that is to get a degree or license of some kind and then claim income for a related service—for example, therapy. For high-end prostitutes, the fear of being caught evading taxes has more to do with reputational damage and harm to their business than legal penalties.

The IRS also receives tax forms from sex workers with no interest in houses or AmEx cards. That’s because the penalty for tax evasion is stiffer than most states’ sentences for prostitution. In Maryland, where the first ACORN video was filmed, the maximum sentence for prostitution is one year in prison and a $500 fine. (Maryland is relatively heavy-handed. Arizona’s prison term for first-time prostitutes is just 15 days.) Tax evasion, on the other hand, can get you five years in jail and a $100,000 fine, plus unpaid taxes and interest. A prostitute who never files can also be prosecuted for evasion by a state government.

Congress has established something of a safe harbor for people reporting income from illegal activities. The IRS may not disclose tax returns to law enforcement authorities unless the individual in question is already under investigation for wrongdoing. In other words, police can use a tax return in their investigation, but it can’t be the initial tip. The opposite is not true: Local police can, and do, notify the IRS that they have uncovered a prostitute or ring of prostitutes who may have violated the tax laws.

Many prostitutes who have been prosecuted for tax evasion have argued that the payment was, in fact, a nontaxable gift unconnected to the sexual relationship. In legal terms, a gift from a lover is made out of “affection, respect, admiration, charity or like impulses,” while taxable income is the direct exchange of money for sex in a quid pro quo relationship. This argument rarely succeeds in court (PDF).

Prostitution has raised a number of peripheral tax issues as well. Last week, for example, the U.S. Tax Court ruled against a tax attorney who tried to write off $100,000 in payments to prostitutes as deductible health care expenses.

Enhanced by Zemanta

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Bookmark and Share